The Global Intelligencer - Exploring individual, social and global transformation
Visit our user forums The Arts Science Technology Society Environment Business
Life & Health Fringe Editorial Subscribe to The Global Intelligencer Advertise with The Global Intelligencer Archives About The Global Intelligencer

The human antenna

by Lynne McTaggart

One weekend in 1994, University of Arizona psychologist Gary Schwartz sat in on a lecture by psychologist Elmer Green, one of the pioneers of biofeedback. Green had decided to study remote healers to determine whether they sent out more electrical energy than usual while in the process of healing.

In his lecture, Green reported that he had built a room, of which the four walls and ceiling were entirely made of copper, and attached to microvolt electroencephalography (EEG) amplifiers—the kind used to measure electrical activity in the brain. Ordinarily, an EEG amplifier is attached to a cap embedded with a network of electrodes, each of which records a separate electrical discharge from different areas of the brain. The cap is fitted onto a person’s head, and the electrical activity that is picked up through the various channels is displayed on the amplifier. EEG amplifiers are extraordinarily sensitive, capable of picking up the most minute of effects—even as tiny as one-millionth of a volt of electricity.

In remote healing, Green explained, he suspected that the signal produced is electrical and emanates from the healer’s hands. The copper wall acts like a giant antenna, magnifying the capacity to detect the electricity from the healers, enabling him to capture it from five directions. Green discovered that, whenever a healer sent healing, the EEG amplifier recorded it as a huge surge of electrostatic charge, the same kind of build-up and discharge of electrons that occurs after you shuffle your feet along a new carpet and then touch a metal doorknob.

He told the class that in the early days of the copper-walls experiment, he had been faced with an enormous problem. Whenever a healer so much as wriggled a finger, patterns were recorded on an EEG amplifier. Green had to work out a means of separating out the true effects of healing from this electrostatic ‘noise’.

Schwartz listened to the talk with growing fascination. Does movement, even the physiology of breathing, create an electromagnetic signal big enough to be picked up on a copper wall? Could it be that human beings were not only receivers of signals, but also transmitters?

After the conference, Schwartz rushed out to buy aluminium shielding, which could also serve as a rudimentary antenna. He purchased some two by fours, placed them on glass bricks to isolate them from the ground and used them to assemble a ‘wall’. After he had attached the wall to an EEG amplifier, he began playing around with the effects of his hand, waving it back and forth above the amplifier. As he suspected, the amplifier tracked the movements. His hand movements were generating signals.

Schwartz began demonstrating these effects in front of his students in his faculty office, using a bust of Einstein for dramatic effect. With these experiments, he made use of an EEG cap, with its dozens of electrodes. When not picking up brain signals, the cap would register only noise on the amplifier. During his experiments, Schwartz placed the EEG cap on the bust of Einstein and turned on just a single electrode channel on the top of the cap. He then moved his hand over Einstein’s head. As though the great man had suddenly experienced a moment of enlightenment, the amplifier suddenly came alive producing evidence of an electromagnetic wave. But the signal, Schwartz explained to his students, was not a sudden brainwave being emitted from the lifeless statue—it was the tracking of the electromagnetic field produced by his arm’s movement. The evidence seemed indisputable: his body must be sending out a signal with every single flutter of his hand.

Schwartz realized he had hit upon the most important point of his research. Simple movements generated electrical charges but, more important, created a relationship. Every movement we make appears to be felt by the people around us.

The implications were staggering. What if he were admonishing a student while shouting, “Don’t do that?” The student might feel as if he were getting shot with a wave of energy. In addition, Schwartz soon realized, some people might even have more powerful positive or negative charges than others. In Elmer Green’s copper-wall experiment for example, all sorts of equipment malfunctioned in the presence of Roslyn Bruyere, a famous healer.

Schwartz was on to something fundamental about the actual energy that human beings emit. Could the energy of thought have the same effect as the energy of movement outside the thinker’s own body? Do thoughts also create a relationship with the people around us? Every intention towards someone else might have its own physical counter-part, which would be registered by its recipient as a physical effect.

Schwartz became even more creative with his experiments. When he tried the same gesture from three feet away, the signal diminished. When he placed the bust of Einstein in a Faraday cage—an enclosure of tightly knit copper mesh that screens out electromagnetic fields—all effect disappeared. This strange energy had all the hallmarks of electricity: it decreased with distance, and was blocked by an electromagnetic shield.

At one point, Schwartz asked one of the students to stand with his left hand over Einstein’s head while extending his right arm towards Schwartz, who was sitting in a chair three feet away. Schwartz moved his arm up and down. To the amazement of the other students, Schwartz’s movement was picked up by the amplifier. The signal had passed through Schwartz’s body and travelled through the student. Schwartz was still generating the signal but, this time, the student had become the antenna, receiving the signal and transmitting it to the amplifier, which acted as another antenna.

Sources: Green EE. ‘Copper wall research psychology and psychophysics: subtle energies and energy medicine: emerging theory and practice’. Proceedings of the First Annual Conference, International Society for the Study of Subtle Energies and Energy Medicine (ISSSEEM), Boulder , Colorado , 21–25 June 1991. And “Subtle Energies,” 1996; 7 (2): 149–84

Lynne McTaggart is a journalist, the award-winning author of the bestselling book The Field and publisher of several alternative health and spirituality newsletters, including the international newsletter What Doctors Don't Tell You. For more information: livingthefield.com & theintentionexperiment.com

 

 

What's the matter with dark matter?

by Mary Avant

For starters, dark matter is physically undetectable. You can’t see dark matter, touch it, or measure it – yet. While elusive, dark matter and dark energy are currently believed to constitute up to 96% of our universe – a stunning concept. The beautiful night sky, with stars twinkling on a backdrop of “empty space” above us, is apparently a vision that may soon have to be radically revised.

Swiss astronomer Fritz Zwicky deduced the existence of dark matter over 70 years ago as an explanation for the inexplicable, yet powerful, gravitational pull that seems to bind clusters of galaxies together. In seems there just isn’t enough matter in the universe to account for the gravitational effects that are seen. In addition to holding the galaxies clumped together, dark matter may well be the reason that stars and constellations and galaxies formed in the first place. Without the gravitational boost of dark matter, some scientists speculate that the hot gases that were created in the Big Bang would never have coalesced to form regular matter in the first place.

In August 2006 NASA announced that a study of the collision of two distant galaxies has now provided solid proof that dark matter does indeed exist. But knowing it exists doesn’t mean anybody has a handle on what it really is or how it manifests. Physicists are now arguing whether the “cold dark matter” they’ve been searching for is really “hot dark matter.” And apparently a recent discovery of a potential link between dark matter and the nature of the Big Bang indicates that dark matter may satisfy the Second Law of Thermodynamics while Cold Dark Matter cannot. But hot or cold, it’s still a mystery to most of us. To help the layperson out, here is a brief interview with former CERN physicist Dr. John Hagelin about the nature of dark matter.

TGI – So what is dark matter?

JH – Dark matter is matter. They are massive particles and let me pause to say, everything is relative. So when I say massive, I still mean very light in comparison to a grain of salt. I mean a massive particle that will weigh several times the proton mass. So dark matter consists of massive particles that weigh, perhaps, several times the proton mass, but are dark because they only interact weakly with ordinary matter.

Dark matter is electrically neutral and therefore is immune to the force of electromagnetism; is transparent with respect to light. Dark matter does not participate in the nuclear force either, and is immune to nuclear forces and nuclear interactions of matter. It only interacts therefore, by process of elimination, via the weak force or radioactive force, or gravity. Under most circumstances gravity is irrelevant, and the principle means of interaction between dark matter and normal matter is therefore via the weak radioactive force. And that’s pretty weak. For that reason you could take a piece of dark matter, just as a neutrino is a normal type of matter that interacts only weakly, and this type of matter can drift through solid lead for centuries without interaction. It will eventually bump into it, but it takes a long time because its interaction is that weak. And it’s dark in that it doesn’t shine, it doesn’t twinkle like light.

TGI – If we can’t see it, or interact with it, how do we know it exists?

JH - There are several reasons we know dark matter exists. One is purely theoretical. Today’s unified field theories based on the superstring, and even previous unified field theories, require the principle of supersymmetry. Supersymmetry is a symmetry principle, in nature, of a bizarre type; one that was only proposed about 20 years ago.

Supersymmetry says that for every particle of any given spin type, let’s say the spin 1 photon, (a photon is an elementary particle of light and has an intrinsic spin equal to one unit of Planck’s Constant). That particle will have a mirror particle, or so-called super-symmetric partner of a different spin. In this case a spin ½ photino. A spin 1 photon, by the way, is a boson; a spin ½ photino is a fermion. Because integral spin 1 particles: spin 0, spin 1, spin 2 are called bosons; Half integral spin particles, like spin ½ and spin 3/2 are called fermions. And bosons and fermions have such fundamentally different properties that we give a name to one major category, a boson, and the other major category fermion. And never the twain shall meet. And they really have diametrically opposed properties.

Therefore it was radical to suggest there might be some unifying principle that could link a fermion, like a spin ½ photino, to a boson, like the spin 1 photon, of electromagnetism. But such a symmetry does exist. And that would predict that for every type of particle we know, including the photon, the graviton etc., there will be a mirror particle with a different spin. Bosons will have a fermionic mirror particle; fermions will have a bosonic mirror particle and the photon, for example will have a photino mirror particle. We haven’t found one yet. They’re a little too heavy to have been produced in the laboratories so far. But we expect to produce these supersymmetric particles in the relatively near future in the laboratory. And that will be a spectacular confirmation of this unifying principle of supersymmetry that unites diametrically opposite types of particles and forces in nature.

I went into that simply to point out that we are relatively confident that photinos exist. And if they do, they would have been produced in the Big Bang and will continue to survive from the Big Bang, as leftover relics. And there will be lots of dark matter out there; matter that we don’t see because it’s dark and weakly interacting. But matter which, it turns out, has very important astro-physical and cosmological effects.

TGI – Why important?

JH – Dark matter is important because it is far more prevalent in the universe in terms of its mass, than normal matter. There’s probably 20 times, 10-20 times as much dark matter in terms of the total mass of the universe in comparison to normal matter. And that makes it very important gravitationally. In fact, now that we understand it, it’s the dark matter that seeds galaxy formation. Dark matter, being the majority of the mass of the universe, starts to clump first, starts to gravitationally self-attract; gravitationally coalesce. So we have dark matter galaxies, which are really just big lumps of dark matter. And on the basis of that gravitational lump, normal matter stars start to also get gravitationally attracted and coalesce to form the galaxies that we see. So the dark matter clumping seeds galaxy formation. And galaxies today, when you look out into the sky, what you’ll see is the observable matter in the form of luminous stars mostly – plus a few black holes. But surrounding these normal galaxies like a big halo will be this, what’s called, dark matter halo which comprises about 90%, maybe even 95% of the mass of the galaxy. And that’s got to be there, or A) the galaxies wouldn’t have formed as early as they did; and B) because their continued presence, these dark matter haloes, affect today the orbital dynamics of galaxies, in particular the orbits of the stars around the galactic core. And the presence of this big surrounding halo of dark matter changes the gravitational dynamics of the orbits of the stars in predictable ways and allows us to understand things like why stars orbit the centers of their galaxies at the rates they do.

TGI So what is dark energy and how does it differ from dark matter?

JH Dark energy is the most mysterious category of all, even more mysterious really than hidden sector matter. Dark energy really consists of vacuum fluctuations, which means it is a completely unmanifest, transcendental form of matter/energy. Devoid of physical content in that there are no particles whatsoever associated with it; no forces associated with it. It is present in a pure vacuum. And it is, in essence, the energy of vibration of emptiness; the energy of the quantum fields fluctuating in a completely unmanifest way. Sometimes this is called zero point energy. Sometimes it’s called the zitterbewegung – jitterbugging you could say - of the abstract quantum fields in vacuo. So it’s a completely transcendental, unmanifest form of energy and matter which you wouldn’t think, intuitively, should have anything to do with the world of manifest matter.

TGI Would you say dark energy would correlate to the Void of Biblical terms?

JH Yeah. It’s the fabric of the Void. It’s the irremovable liveliness, or dynamism, within the abstract Void. But amazingly, according to Einstein’s equations, he debated whether or not to include this term in his general relativistic field equations, because although logically plausible, the term made little intuitive sense to Einstein that pure emptiness could have a physical impact on the physical universe. But, nevertheless that term – there is a term – in Einstein’s general relativistic field equations governing gravity which says that this completely, unmanifest transcendental form of matter/energy, of dark energy, that has an influence not directly upon matter, but upon gravity - upon the curvature of space. Gravity really is just a side-effect of the curvature of the space/time geometry in which we live.

So the presence of these abstract, unmanifest, transcendental fluctuations is to produce an influence on gravity – space/time curvature – of a particular, predictable type. And that influence is one of gravitational repulsion of space. Let’s call it the gravitational self-repulsion of space, causing space to expand away from itself at an exponentially increasing speed. Very similar to what happened in the early universe during in the so-called inflationary epoch. And it refers to the first billionth of a second of the universe where the universe rapidly emerged and underwent a process of exponential runaway inflationary expansion.

So that same influence present in the early universe in this so-called inflationary epoch is still there today, because these vacuum fluctuations, this energy of the Void, has never gone away and continues to cause the universe to expand away from itself; and in principle will continue to expand and accelerate in its expansion forever.

 







   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Forums | The Arts | Living | Education | Science & Technology | Society & Health
Business | Environment | Fringe | Editorial | Subscribe | Advertise | Archives | About TGI

All content on this website, and the websites of our affiliate publications, is copyrighted and may not be used or duplicated in any fashion without express written and contractual consent of Global Intelligence Press. © 2006 Global Intelligence Press

Website design by MetaDesign and Shelly Lucus. Code by newdaydesign.com