The Global Intelligencer - Exploring individual, social and global transformation
Visit our user forums The Arts Science Technology Society Environment Business
Life & Health Fringe Editorial Subscribe to The Global Intelligencer Advertise with The Global Intelligencer Archives About The Global Intelligencer

EMPTY BOXES

Sometimes we don't realize how much something has changed until we look through someone else's eyes and discover we're seeing a different world.

I was recently at a presentation on racism at a conference. It was a setup. We were told we were racist because we had white skin. The speaker didn't know us. It wasn't that we were white, it was that she was focusing on a surface distinction that she (with reason) was paying attention to. Which may be what racism is. And sex-ism, and class-ism, and religion-ism, and culture-ism.

Those are all just symptoms, to me, of a culture that makes people insecure and needing to magnify small distinctions between themselves and others to feel in some way superior and thus secure. All those things vanish when we connect deeply with others and love, or are grated by, their way-bigger individual inner weirdnesses.

It's hard to reach out and connect with "different" people. I get real shy where I can't even say hello in their heart-language, or have some common culture. But it's also incredibly more interesting after we break through and get to know our real differentnesses and also the samenesses we share.

Interestingly, I don't seem to live much in that "ism" culture anymore. We may occupy the same space, but what is central to that culture is peripheral and insignificant in my world. I don't care that much about "outsides" or surfaces. What people wear, the color of their hair or skin; their religion or culture or class. What interests me, what I remember, is their energy, joys, passions, experiences and capabilities. What they value and give. As a guy in a wheelchair once said, "But I'm not crippled inside!"

Then I got an email from my editor at Global Intelligencer. They were adding a new section to the newsletter, and wanted to move my economics column to that section. Wondering where I should be, I looked at their layout. At the bottom of the page were nine boxes: arts, society, life & health, environment, science, technology business, fringe, and editorial. So I was supposed to fit in one of those boxes? (Fringe, of course, but they wouldn't let me in that one!)

Suddenly I felt the wrongness of those apparently simple and helpful boxes. Life isn't like that. Everything is part of everything else, and connected. Putting walls in our minds and in our lives between things destroys the connectedness that is vital. Shouldn't there be art in life? Environment in business? What about joy? The sacred?

No. Don't put things in boxes. I don't fit, nobody, nothing does. Life doesn't fit. Boxes are wrong. Unlike other languages, ours is based on nouns - boxes that focus on distinctions or separateness rather than connectedness. That's wrong, and causes wars. Us-box vs. them-box. Our culture, based on the rational, and literate in our language, is wrong. Anymore, when someone tries to talk "rational", I can feel them closing off, shutting down, disconnecting their aliveness and connection to the rest of creation. It breaks my heart. I can feel them dying inside.

So what might a newsletter look like that arises from, reflects, and nurtures a sustainable world? Maybe it starts with a "cover" page, not a word- and mind-centered index. A powerful image, that moves and breaks open our hearts, that connects with and enlivens our emotions, that resonates with our integral qi-energy consciousness, not our cerebral one. Contents that share experience of deeper, living truths.

A list of contents-links, like on a magazine cover, but not by categories. Who knows which is important to which reader? Who knows what each piece will touch and connect, what links it strengthens, what new realms it opens?

What we need are things that break our mind-boxes open, that illuminate something new and precious, or zap to the core of an issue. I once edited a ten page manuscript someone submitted to RAIN down to a single sentence, put it with an image and white space, and gave it half the back cover of the magazine. The writer (fortunately) was ecstatic! And it was powerful. Hmm, fewer word-boxes, more power. Interesting.

All of our culture is based on boxes. Economics analytical boxes that "discount the future" and ensure we can't have a good one. The box says there should be a "bottom line" in what we do. As long as I've been working with economics, it only became clear to me recently that there is no bottom line in honest economics. No "triple" bottom line. No bottom line. Any bottom line is a linear and singular focus. True economics isn't about best bottom line for anything.

It's about balance. There's a web that connects any one thing to everything else. Everything we do affects, in some way, everything else. And when you change anything, the web in some directions gets stretched. And it pulls back, or everything shifts a little, and things come back into balance. Everything gets what it needs, everything is accommodated. Nothing gets "maxed". If it can't rebalance, everything collapses.

True economics is dynamic. It welcomes and adjusts to every "new" through thousands of subtle shifts and rebalancing. And the whole is ever-new and alive.

So piece by piece, as we let go of those crazy mind-boxes that don't fit, and shift our lives to ways of being that nurture us better, we create a new world. And after time, we suddenly see it IS different, and way more alive.

All those mind-boxes walling-off connections are really coffins of the soul, prisons of the spirit. And sadly, sadly, it is those dead and disconnected spirits inside those boxes, whose hearts have withered from lack of nurture, who are capable of the atrocities that occur around us every day.

Let them out. Let go our mind-boxes, give them sunlight, and food. Heal their hearts, share the emotions that give life. Everything will be OK.


© Tom Bender. Tom Bender is an architect (among other things) and one of the founders of the "green architecture" and “sustainability" movements. His "Factor 10" economic principles have been endorsed by the European Union, the World Business Council for Sustainable Development, and the United Nations Environmental Program. He is the author of Environmental design primer, Building with the Breath of Life, and Learning to Count What Really Counts: The Economics of Wholeness. www.tombender.org

 

 
user warning: Access denied for user: 'dbo235082792@%' to database 'db235082792' query: INSERT INTO vbdrupal_cache (cid, data, created, expire, headers) VALUES ('locale:en-us', 'a:826:{s:10:\"Navigation\";b:1;s:13:\"input formats\";b:1;s:4:\"list\";b:1;s:16:\"add input format\";b:1;s:19:\"delete input format\";b:1;s:12:\"compose tips\";b:1;s:7:\"content\";b:1;s:6:\"search\";b:1;s:5:\"posts\";b:1;s:13:\"content types\";b:1;s:14:\"create content\";b:1;s:8:\"rss feed\";b:1;s:13:\"file download\";b:1;s:10:\"administer\";b:1;s:6:\"themes\";b:1;s:9:\"configure\";b:1;s:15:\"global settings\";b:1;s:8:\"settings\";b:1;s:6:\"paging\";b:1;s:5:\"print\";b:1;s:7:\"modules\";b:1;s:12:\"user account\";b:1;s:17:\"user autocomplete\";b:1;s:6:\"log in\";b:1;s:8:\"r in /homepages/29/d234610493/htdocs/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 121.

Choosing Simplicity:

Real people finding peace and fulfillment in a complex world

by Linda Breen Pierce

Joe and Cindy Pfender had it made. They owned a beautiful, brand new 2,200 square foot home set on one-half acre outside of Houston. Their home was located in a lovely neighborhood brimming with Southern hospitality and seven community pools for those hot Texas summers. They were the proud parents of three children - Chelsea, six, Shane, two, and Quinn, the baby in the family.

Joe worked hard to provide this lifestyle for his family. Every morning he left for work at 7:00 a.m. and returned 12 or more hours later. His commute took 45 minutes each way. He spent his evenings reading and responding to over 200 e-mail messages related to his job as a regional sales manager for a major steamship line. Pressure from senior management and customers was constant, but Joe handled it quite well - at least that's how it appeared from the outside. He entertained his customers frequently with drinks and dinners in fine restaurants. Many weekends he was away on business trips. Joe had the feeling that his work week never really began or ended.

Not surprisingly, Cindy began to feel like a single parent. On those frequent evenings when Joe did not make it home for dinner, she hauled the kids off to a fast food restaurant for dinner, a distraction - something of a treat to compensate for their missing father and husband.

One day Chelsea came to her dad with a drawing and proudly announced, "Daddy, look what I did." Joe pointed to each person in the picture and asked Chelsea to tell him about each one. Chelsea responded, "That's Quinn. He's crying. That's Shane. He just hit Quinn. I am reading a book and Mommy is cooking dinner." Chelsea then pointed to the one remaining figure, saying, "That's you, Daddy." "But why is my face all colored in?" Joe asked his daughter. "That's not your face, Daddy, that's the back of your head. You're working on your computer."

Chelsea's drawing was a stunning revelation to Joe. He envisioned his daughter all grown up and remembering her dad as a person who was always working, a person who was not there for her. At that moment, Joe understood what was most important to him. It was not the status and stimulation of his job, his house, the swimming pools, or the health club. It was his wife and his three children. As Joe reflected, "No amount of money or position or home or belongings can replace supporting one another and going through the process of raising our children together." Joe and Cindy's story is representative of millions of people in the world today. As we move into the next millennium, people everywhere, but especially in North America, are questioning what it really means to have the "good life" we have worked so hard to achieve.

How We Got Here

It has been a fifty-year odyssey to get where we are today. Shortly after World War II, we entered a period of great prosperity and material abundance - a prosperity that continues to grow unabated, except for minor fluctuations from time to time. But here we are, fifty years later, with many of us finding that our hearts and souls are hurting. The prosperity we have enjoyed - our larger and more luxurious homes that house our increasing cadre of furniture, clothes, gadgets and toys, in addition to our fancier cars, second homes, and lavish vacations - is just not enough. These things do not bring us the happiness and peace we hoped for and expected. According to the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago, we Americans earn twice as much money at the close of the twentieth century than we did in 1957; yet, the percentage of people who report that they are "very happy" has declined during the same period.

In fact, we are struggling to make sense of the spiritual and emotional wasteland we call modern life. We feel trapped in an almost compulsive drive to amass more wealth, status, and power. There is an addictive quality to this consumer-driven lifestyle. No doubt about it, each additional boost of wealth, status, and power gives us a high that feels so good. But like any addiction, the high is fleeting, often leaving us feeling worse than ever and convinced that the solution is to get more.

If materialism is addictive, so is our desire for productivity and efficiency. We are constantly trying to milk the most out of each minute of the day - on the phone while doing something else (like driving), driving instead of walking, reading the newspaper while eating breakfast, watching TV while helping our kids with their homework. Our love affair with productivity and efficiency generates busy, chattering minds. We are like the lead robot character in the movie "Short Circuit," always clamoring for more input. Often we have trouble relaxing when we finally get some leisure time; we cannot easily escape the habit of working, thinking, and above all, saving time.

And we have plenty of company. When an addiction is the cultural norm, it is hard to realize we need help. After all, isn't everybody doing it? Gaining perspective on our condition is a real challenge when our society depends on our staying this way to continue its economic growth. The 1995 report, Yearning for Balance, prepared by The Harwood Group and commissioned by the Merck Family Fund, concluded that we Americans feel our priorities are "out of whack, that materialism, greed, and selfishness increasingly dominate American life, crowding out a more meaningful set of values centered on family, responsibility, and community." However, the report also indicates that we are ambivalent about what to do. We are attached to our material comforts and do not want to give them up. At the same time, we are aware that our deepest aspirations are non-material ones.

And what exactly are our deepest aspirations? What do we seek out of this experience called life on earth? These questions have engaged writers, thinkers, philosophers, and spiritual teachers since time began. I could not possibly address the full scope of these life questions. However, I suggest that most of what we want in life are aspects or manifestations of two overriding desires: inner peace and fulfillment.

We know, of course, that removing all sources of stress in our lives will not by itself make us happy. We also seek fulfillment; we seek to serve some purpose in this life, to feel that our lives have meaning. We seem to be genetically programmed to learn, to grow, and to make a contribution. And so, our individual life paths become yin and yang affairs. For example, we may try working in a certain job that is challenging and rewarding, bringing us fulfillment. At the same time, however, the job may not be congruent with our values, or the work activity or hours may be too intense, depriving us of inner peace. Peace and fulfillment do not always lead to one another; sometimes they lie at opposite poles. We are continually balancing the desire for inner peace - facilitated by a quiet, inner life - with the desire to go out into the world, interact with others, create, and contribute.

And it is in this respect that the practice of voluntary simplicity can help. Living simply can facilitate a life of balance, purpose, and joy. It allows us to gain perspective on our material needs and desires, which in turn gives us the opportunity to satisfy our non-material drives for inner peace and fulfillment.

Getting Clear About What Simple Living Really Means

The concept of simple living carries with it numerous myths and misconceptions. Perhaps the biggest misconception is that simple living is the same thing as easy living. Often, it is far from easy. Another common misconception is that simple living involves depriving oneself of the material benefits of modern life. Deprivation is not a part of the true meaning of simplicity. Voluntary is a key element of the philosophy of simple living. Living without adequate food, shelter, clothing, and medical care is not simple living. Nor is it voluntary simplicity; it is involuntary poverty.

The term simple living truly is a misnomer. More descriptive terms might include "mindful living" or "intentional living," terms that are neutral on the issue of whether more is better or less is more. In truth, sometimes more is better, depending on the person and the issue being considered. My best shot at a definition of simple living would go something like this: Simple living or voluntary simplicity are lifelong processes in which we turn loose of the quest for more wealth, status, and power in favor of an authentic life of inner peace and fulfillment. When we view simple living or voluntary simplicity in this way, it becomes clear that there are no rigid rules to this approach to life. When thinking about simple living, some people envision moving to the country, growing their own food, chopping wood for fuel, and living in isolation. Others might picture a life in the city, living in a small, sparsely furnished apartment with no job. You may be surprised to know that only a small percentage of people who simplify their lives choose these lifestyles, which are more the exception than the rule. Many others who simplify live much more conventional lives, often continuing to work for a living, raise their families, explore their religious or spiritual interests, connect with their communities, and enjoy their leisure time.

Living simply is not about rejecting the material comforts in life. However, it does involve unburdening our lives, living more lightly with fewer distractions - whether they are material things, activities, or relationships. It means letting go of anything that interferes with a high quality life.

Many of us are attracted to simple living because our lives are stressful and complicated. Sometimes, we get to a point where we have all the outward appearances of success but feel a vague, unsettling emptiness inside. So, what can we do about this? How exactly do we simplify our lives? The answer is not merely to read a variety of how-to-simplify-your-life books and then select some tips and tricks to incorporate into your life. It involves a much more creative, complex, deep, and soul-searching process.

Simplicity requires a two-step process. First, we must invest the time and energy to discover what stirs us as human beings, what makes our hearts sing, and what brings us joy. Then, we must proceed to create the life that reflects the unique people we truly are. This is the heart and soul of simplicity and is what this book is all about.


This excerpt is from Linda Breen Pierce's Choosing Simplicity: Real People Finding Peace and Fulfillment in a Complex World. For more information please go to her website The Simplicity Resource Guide.

 








   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Forums | The Arts | Living | Education | Science & Technology | Society & Health
Business | Environment | Fringe | Editorial | Subscribe | Advertise | Archives | About TGI

All content on this website, and the websites of our affiliate publications, is copyrighted and may not be used or duplicated in any fashion without express written and contractual consent of Global Intelligence Press. © 2006 Global Intelligence Press

Website design by MetaDesign and Shelly Lucus. Code by newdaydesign.com