The Global Intelligencer - Exploring individual, social and global transformation
Visit our user forums The Arts Science Technology Society Environment Business
Life & Health Fringe Editorial Subscribe to The Global Intelligencer Advertise with The Global Intelligencer Archives About The Global Intelligencer

A-theism: Humanity’s loss

For a long time there has been no shortage of people who have made a living pointing out the strangeness of religion. Recently they have been joined by those who have successfully made a profession out of pointing out the strangeness of science. As Douglas Adams said in a speech at Cambridge several years ago, “The fact that we live at the bottom of a deep gravity well, on the surface of a gas covered plant, going round a nuclear fireball ninety million miles away, and that we regard all this as normal, is obviously some indication of how askew our perspective on what is natural tends to be.”

Breathtaking and unwarranted assumptions about what is normal or natural have bedeviled the relationship between the world views we crudely label “religion” and “science,” with customary little regard for the variety of forms that hide under each of those descriptions.

I’m told that more than 90% of those elected to the American Academy of Scientists today are atheists. Of course I have no way of verifying that, and I’m not sure if anyone else could either. However, if it’s even close to true that 90% of the people now in the vanguard of creative human reflection and discovery in our world are atheists, then that is a very disquieting fact - and not just for the religious-minded.

True, many of these scientists may still be practicing members of particular religious organizations even if they no longer subscribe to the views that their religions officially have about how the universe began, how it functions, or where we fit into it. Some may have successfully compartmentalized their lives and stayed religiously attached because of the ethical code which religious membership provides as a guide to life. Some may want to pass on a code of values to their children.

However, providing an ethical code does not provide the smallest vindication for the supernatural claims about reality which many religions proclaim; for example, that God had a particularly busy week just over 6,000 years ago when he created the universe, or that humans on earth are the only intelligent form of life in the universe. And, of course, religions also provide all sorts of dubious ethical codes as well. If we were still taking some of the most revered historical religious texts literally, we would be stoning adulteresses to death (note the feminine form) and selling unfortunates into slavery as a punishment. And certianly a view of God or a religion that can be marshaled to justify such atrocities as the destruction of the World Trade Center doesn’t say much for the religious basis of those ethics, or for the type of God that’s envisaged to lie behind it.

If 90% of the American Academy of Scientists can truly be said to be atheists, much of that agnosticism and atheism is probably a reaction against such caricatures of God and unacceptable and inconsistent ethical standards. In fact religions have probably done more damage to God than any other agency in human history. Some of history’s most horrific atrocities have come, rather curiously, from preaching and practicing hatred in the name of a God of love. And we still see such hypocrisy on the news every day.

But back to our a-theistic scientists. An atheist is customarily understood as someone who believes there is nothing beyond the natural physical world – as some wag once put it, “A person with no invisible means of support.” For the atheist there is no brooding, creative intelligence behind existence. There is no survival after death. And, since the world is comprised of only natural phenomena (whose physics we have not as yet come to understand), there are no miracles.

If I am concerned that so many of the leading thinkers of our day believe themselves to be atheists, it is not because I am concerned that some brooding deity somewhere is not getting “his” due share of worship. (If there were such a being who needed our worship “he” would, by that very need, have forfeited any realistic claim to be God.) Nor am I concerned that God is apparently the principal casualty of atheism. No. What is tragic is that so many of today’s leading thinkers - turned off by second-hand mythologies about a second-hand God - conclude that there is no such thing as survival of the death of the physical body. Even worse, by extension, they conclude there is nothing truly remarkable that the human being can accomplish outside of the physical while still alive. This is throwing out the baby with the bathwater. Ultimately, the denial of any ‘divine’ element in the human person imprisons us and creates yet another form of slavery. Human beings, not God, are the real losers in the bleak landscape of atheism.

Dr. Miceal Ledwith, L.Ph., L.D., D.D., LL.D. (h.c.) has been a Professor of Theology and University President of MaynoothCollege in Ireland, a member of the Vatican’s International Theological Commission, and has lectured extensively throughout Europe and North America. He has been a long-time member of the Ramtha School of Ancient Wisdom. He can be reached at hamburgeruniverse.com

 

 
user warning: Access denied for user: 'dbo235082792@%' to database 'db235082792' query: INSERT INTO vbdrupal_cache (cid, data, created, expire, headers) VALUES ('locale:en-us', 'a:826:{s:10:\"Navigation\";b:1;s:13:\"input formats\";b:1;s:4:\"list\";b:1;s:16:\"add input format\";b:1;s:19:\"delete input format\";b:1;s:12:\"compose tips\";b:1;s:7:\"content\";b:1;s:6:\"search\";b:1;s:5:\"posts\";b:1;s:13:\"content types\";b:1;s:14:\"create content\";b:1;s:8:\"rss feed\";b:1;s:13:\"file download\";b:1;s:10:\"administer\";b:1;s:6:\"themes\";b:1;s:9:\"configure\";b:1;s:15:\"global settings\";b:1;s:8:\"settings\";b:1;s:6:\"paging\";b:1;s:5:\"print\";b:1;s:7:\"modules\";b:1;s:12:\"user account\";b:1;s:17:\"user autocomplete\";b:1;s:6:\"log in\";b:1;s:8:\"r in /homepages/29/d234610493/htdocs/includes/database.mysql.inc on line 121.

Mapping your brain: Making the subconscious visible

by Janet Rae
After fifteen years of self-introspection, transformation seminars, and spiritual healings, “Nancy” still had episodes of irritation followed by outbursts of anger and yelling. It was the most damaging when she acted this out towards her nine-year-old son, who was the pride and joy of her life. Then she participated in a unique workshop called Mind Imaging, and learned about her “neural net” of anger and how to apply certain tools to change that behavior pattern. A week later, she and her son were running late, sitting in traffic on the way to a birthday party on the other side of town when her son accidentally ripped the birthday present he was taking. Her first reaction was, “That’s ok honey, we can tape it when we get there.” Her next reaction was to wonder, “Who just said that?” The cycle of irritation and explosive anger didn’t just shift, it had disappeared.

Mark Evan Furman, a cognitive neuro-scientist and author of The Neurophysics of Human Behavior, has distilled over two-dozen branches of science to develop and test a process called Mind Imaging. A scientific process which brings the complex and elusive matrix of our own mind from the realm of the invisible to the realm of the visible, Mind Imaging allows each participant to craft an “image” that accurately represents the structure of their unique mind. The final image is called a NeuroPrint and includes the three raw building blocks of a mind; our thoughts and beliefs, our emotions, feelings and moods and our behaviors.

According to Furman, for those who have learned to apply this technology, the reported results have been specific and measurable. Anecdotally these include one person doubling monthly income in four weeks, another losing 20 pounds in 60 days, and another apparently overcoming depression. A teenager labeled Learning Disabled who was previously unable to spell, was able to learn how to spell backwards and forwards in 10 minutes.

In the Mind Imaging technology, the NeuroPrint acts as a feedback mechanism so people can get a visual on the matrix of their mind. The value of this feedback mechanism is compared to looking in the mirror. Every day, a common mirror provides the necessary feedback that allows us to bridge the gap between how we look when we wake up in the morning and the picture or goal of how we want to look when we leave the house. Using this simple feedback tool we gain great control over our appearance. In fact, with a little practice we can make very precise changes such as selecting and plucking a single eyebrow hair. Without the simple feedback function a mirror provides we would have very limited control over our personal appearance.

The Mind Imaging technology is based on the same premise. If the mind can objectively “see itself,” then adjustments can be made in present emotion/thought patterns to create a desired change that can enable people to more rapidly achieve their dreams and goals. The Mind Imaging process allows participants to craft a representation of their unique mind. The resulting NeuroPrint provides feedback that works just like a mirror for your mind. It allows you to see your mind at that given point in time. Once you can accurately see a representation of your mind, you can use the Mind Imaging techniques to make rapid, measurable and stable changes to the thoughts, feelings and behaviors that constitute your mind.

“Mind Imaging allows us to apply scientific measurements to our beliefs, emotions, and behaviors,” says Mark Furman states. “It allows us to precisely measure the velocity, duration, probability and trajectory of these aspects of the mind.” Furman points out that these measurements are objective and not based on a simple subjective intensity scale, such as a Subjective Unit of Disturbance (SUD). In other words it goes far beyond a subjective calculation like, “On a scale of one to ten, how angry were you.?”

“We can now precisely influence any part of the system we call mind, with tools that have been proven to work with tens of thousands of individuals from all over the world,” he says. “These tools are laser precise.”

John Freedom, an Emotional Freedom Technique (EFT) specialist and counselor for over 16 years, has taken the Mind Imaging workshop twice. He says the model, though useful, is still “guesstimation” in regards to the accuracy of getting a mind image. He believes that since the mind is never static that the precision of the image created is questionable. However he adds, “The process adds greater awareness to the emotional states felt. I felt a greater sense of confidence about the possibility of achieving my goals after taking the workshop.”

In the Mind Imaging workshop, participants learn the science behind setting and achieving their dreams and goals. They examine their own thoughts, feelings and behaviors that are the biggest blocks to accomplishing those dreams and goals. Then they learn the NeuroPrinting process, listing and experiencing frequent emotional states, and applying simple mathematical calculations to them. They even measure the velocity of these states with a stopwatch. The next step is “Art Class.” In this phase of the Mind Imaging process participants convert their calculations and measurements into colored circles and lines on paper that become a “map” of their mind which includes emotions, behaviors and beliefs.

Practical tools are taught that allow individuals to create new neural pathways from their most negative emotional states to the emotional states that are most likely to move them toward their dreams and goals. The changes are even measured with a stopwatch to document effectiveness. It is common for some participants to have a 50% improvement in establishing a new neural pathway from a negative emotion to a positive one in a short period of time. For example, the emotion of depression could be linked to loving so that as soon as depression is felt it leads to a feeling of love. Because the brain operates in essentially an associative manner, Mind Imaging workshops take care to teach participants how to prevent simply expanding the neuro-net of their negative emotions to include other stimuli.

According to Dr. Fred Gallo, a clinical psychologist who coined the term Energy Psychology, the limitation of this process lies with the individual. “Not everyone who just looks at their NeuroPrint will change,” he points out. “Some will need help with the change.” In addition, the NeuroPrint is just a road map and, like any road map, it will need regular updating. If someone decides to learn this strategy, to be most effective, it is useful to update it regularly. Furman himself recommends updating the NeuroPrint every three to four weeks because your NeuroPrint will change as you achieve your dreams and goals. As you take on newer, bigger dreams and goals, new limiting thoughts, emotions and behaviors are likely to show up.

Furman cautions his students that the greatest illusion that we’ve been living is that thought controls behavior. We cannot think our way to better behaviors or emotions because our emotions and behaviors are under subconscious control and willful thinking is under conscious control. “Have you ever tried to stop being mad in the middle of being full-blown mad?” Furman asks. “Subconscious programming is hundreds of times faster than our conscious awareness. Therefore, whenever conscious programming comes into conflict with unconscious programming, unconscious programming will always win because it is 500 and 1,000 times faster than our conscious awareness.”

Bruce Lipton, in his article, Mind Over Genes: The New Biology, discusses this phenomenon, revealing that the subconscious mind is a million times more powerful as an info rmation processor than the conscious mind. Plus, as neuroscientists emphasize, the conscious mind provides 5% or less of the cognitive activity during the day. “Ninety-five to ninety-nine percent of our behavior is directly derived from the subconscious,” writes lipton. “Hence the use of the word ‘power’ in the concept of will power. It takes significant effort for the conscious mind to keep tabs on the subconscious behavior. Positive thinking is primarily effective if the subconscious supports the conscious intention.”

In other words, according to Lipton, you can’t think yourself into a good mood unless the shape of your subconscious mind has already been programmed, or reprogrammed, to function that way.

“We can use a variety of new energy psychology modalities that enable a rapid and profound reprogramming of limiting subconscious beliefs,” he says. “These new energy modalities provide the ability to rewrite limiting perceptions (beliefs) and self-sabotaging behaviors using processes that are mechanistically similar to pushing the record program on the subconscious mind’s tape player. With conscious awareness, one can actively transform the character of their lives into ones filled with love, health and prosperity.”

Mind Imaging may be one of the new modalities that can serve as a tool to bring subconscious programs to the surface - making the invisible visible so that conscious changes can be made. This was, as Mark states, “your dreams become reality.”

For more info rmation about Mind Imaging, go to www.mindimagingtechnologies.com. Janet Rae will host a web conference with Mark Furman Wednesday, February 28 at 7:00 PM MST, 9:00 PM EST. The conference call number is (641) 985-1200 and the Access Code is 1086844#.

 







   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Forums | The Arts | Living | Education | Science & Technology | Society & Health
Business | Environment | Fringe | Editorial | Subscribe | Advertise | Archives | About TGI

All content on this website, and the websites of our affiliate publications, is copyrighted and may not be used or duplicated in any fashion without express written and contractual consent of Global Intelligence Press. © 2006 Global Intelligence Press

Website design by MetaDesign and Shelly Lucus. Code by newdaydesign.com